Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[ADP02]

I�ve been challenging you to a duel type setting for over a month now. That�s what you call deflecting and hiding? Let me show you what deflecting and hiding looks like:



LMAO. You have a very big ego for someone who has been proven wrong as much as you have.



Wait?I tried that. You DEFLECTED to labeling them biased. LMAO.

Dr. Hani Khella: A certified medical review officer for 20 years.

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-19%20at%207.43.05%20AM.png[/IMG]

Diaz�s medical expert, Dr. Hani Khella, testified that the variations in the test results were �not medically plausible.?Dr. Khella stated that the difference between concentrations in the two post-fight tests could not be attributed to simple rehydration and that Diaz would have had to endanger his life by drinking ?0 glasses of water?in such a short timeframe. The doctor testified that the increase between Diaz�s first and third tests was �typical movement that you would expect to see in a more concentrated sample or more dehydrated sample.?/b>

Jeff Novitzky: Anti-Doping Expert



"They got this one wrong, in my opinion. The Quest Labs sample was 733 ng/ml, one of the highest I�ve ever seen.

There are big issues in interpreting those results.

There�s no real scientific medical explanation for someone having a 40, then right after the fight a 733, and shortly after that back to 60."


Kevin Iole: Combat Sports Insider/Sports Writer



He was present at the Silva disciplinary hearing. Not sure if he was present at Diaz?but he certainly reviewed it. He was one of the first to report on the failed drug tests of both Silva and Diaz.

"The members of the Nevada Athletic Commission who voted in September to suspend Nick Diaz for five years and fine him $165,000 for smoking marijuana looked like a gang of fools far more than a serious regulatory body.
It was an unconscionable overreach, particularly because the commission didn�t prove to any neutral observer�s satisfaction that Diaz had marijuana in his system when he fought Anderson Silva in Las Vegas on Jan. 31, 2015, at UFC 183.

�the commission utterly failed to prove [Diaz smoked marijuana before the fight]".



LMAO@ Kevin Iole calling you out as being non-neutral�and he doesn�t even know you. Wow. this guy must be a ****ing wizard!







So about this challenge?



That�s the ****in point! Do you have any idea how a court of law works. Of course this wouldn�t be a court of law, but you would have to prove your point. I would have to prove my point. Let the best poster win. What are you afraid of?

So are you down or what???

Kevin Iole I'm sure is a nice guy and all but his job is just to report ..... he is no expert. NEXT!


SO again, you come back with Diaz's defense team that used UNRELIABLE DATA to prove that Diaz did not have marijuana levels but all urine samples had levels and if you take into consideration the dilution of SMRTLs vs QUESTs samples, it would explain everything unless your name is Travestyny. Its just too complicated for him!




Here is their twisted look at RETRO TUEs and this was in respect to one of those athletes .... just unbelievable! The head of WADA TUE Committee would be flipping at the below statements.

Novitzky said
�There is a process called a retroactive TUE, which would allow an athlete to go back and say, ?span style="color:darkred">Hey, I made a mistake by not submitting my TUE (ahead of time), but here�s my records showing I really did need this medically,?Novitzky said. ?b>Generally, an athlete could be afforded that process where they could go back to their doctor and show why there was a medical need for it.?br />


Novitzky said any such request would have been thoroughly vetted. Again, he stressed his comments were about the process in general and was not referring specifically to Penn�s case.

�Once that�s submitted, it goes to a TUE committee that USADA has, a group of experts and medical doctors that look at the application to determine whether or not there was a medical need,?he said. �So both of those things, putting together the request and then the committee reviewing it, can be a matter of weeks or, in extreme cases, months.?br />
It was nearly two months from the time Penn admitted he had used an IV until a notice of a potential violation of the anti-doping policy was announced.



Then Novitsky admits that RETRO TUE requests would be thoroughly vetted .... exception, FLOYD!!! Floyd request came back next day rubber stamped and approved .... money can buy a RETRO TUE!

[travestyny]

Kevin Iole I'm sure is a nice guy and all but his job is just to report ..... he is no expert. NEXT!

Oh, now you want experts? I GAVE YOU TWO EXPERTS THAT SAID YOU ARE WRONG!!! HOW MANY EXPERTS DID YOU GIVE THAT SAID YOU ARE RIGHT? ZEROOOOOO! YOU KEEP STEPING IN SHlT!

SO again, you come back with Diaz's defense team that used UNRELIABLE DATA to prove that Diaz did not have marijuana levels but all urine samples had levels and if you take into consideration the dilution of SMRTLs vs QUESTs samples, it would explain everything unless your name is Travestyny. Its just too complicated for him!

You keep trying to go with this "unreliable data" bullshlt. You still claim Diaz had 2 hours to dilute...but with 1hr 17 minutes to go he was slightly dehydrated. YOU ****ING MORON. THAT OBVIOUSLY MEANS HE WASN'T DILUTING DURING THE TIME YOU CLAIM HE WAS. YOU HAVE TO BE A MORON TO KEEP GOING WITH THIS. Then we have the 733ng/ml of marijuana. The expert said it can be above, or below this mark, but the highly accurate GC/MS put out this number. So you want to just throw it away and claim it is closer to 300??? If it can be HIGHER or lower, and the expert said CERTAINLY WELL ABOVE 300, then it makes sense to accept 733ng/ml when reviewing the case, just as the ****ing MRO whose job it is to REVIEW DRUG TESTING accepted. Finally, you claim the quest tests were invalid despite the MRO and the WADA lab expert saying they were consistent. Oh, that's right, ADP02 suddenly forgot what consistent means. LMAO.

SO DON'T YOU MEAN IT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING UNLESS YOUR NAME IS DR. HANI KELLER, A 20 YEAR MRO VET, OR ANTI-DOPING EXPERT NOVITSKY, OR INSIDER KEVIN IOLE WHO BASICALLY STATED THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ANYONE UNLESS YOU'RE A BIASED MORON!!!????? LMAOOOOOO. GIVE UP, CLOWN. YOU HAVE NO EXPERTS ON YOUR SIDE. I HAVE 2. AND THIS IS THE REASON YOU DUCKED OUT ON THE THUNDERDOME. YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T SELL YOUR STORY. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!

Here is their twisted look at RETRO TUEs and this was in respect to one of those athletes .... just unbelievable! The head of WADA TUE Committee would be flipping at the below statements.

Novitzky said
“There is a process called a retroactive TUE, which would allow an athlete to go back and say, ‘Hey, I made a mistake by not submitting my TUE (ahead of time), but here’s my records showing I really did need this medically,” Novitzky said. “Generally, an athlete could be afforded that process where they could go back to their doctor and show why there was a medical need for it.”



Novitzky said any such request would have been thoroughly vetted. Again, he stressed his comments were about the process in general and was not referring specifically to Penn’s case.

“Once that’s submitted, it goes to a TUE committee that USADA has, a group of experts and medical doctors that look at the application to determine whether or not there was a medical need,” he said. “So both of those things, putting together the request and then the committee reviewing it, can be a matter of weeks or, in extreme cases, months.”

It was nearly two months from the time Penn admitted he had used an IV until a notice of a potential violation of the anti-doping policy was announced.



Then Novitsky admits that RETRO TUE requests would be thoroughly vetted .... exception, FLOYD!!! Floyd request came back next day rubber stamped and approved .... money can buy a RETRO TUE!

Lmao. Kevin Iole, an insider who first reported on the IV, first reported on the results of the drug testing, and first reports on a lot of thing because he IS in the know, basically called you a moron, Novitsky is an anti-doping expert that is known to be tough on cheaters and went hard after Lance, and he was singing the praises of USADA even when asked about this case, and you are still deflecting to BJ Penn when the situations are not the same.

I think we call that DEFLECTING.

Plus you ****ed up when it comes to EPO. ITS OVERRRR. GIVE UP.

Don't even talk to me about diaz again unless you are willing to step up and present your case in the thunderdome. I'm tired of beating you to a pulp over this issue. You keep ducking and dodging me and pretending you can't understand how the time doesn't work out for you, how the experts disagree with you, and can't even understand what the **** is meant by consistent. Talking to you is like talking to a brain dead goat. Seriously. Step the **** up or go sit your dumb ass in a corner. You are afraid because...what was it that you said...the judges would only choose the person with the best info.??? Well that's the ****ing point, idiot. Unless you are willing to accept, you don't get to be a coward and keep talking the same **** over and over. You are afraid for this to end because you would have to settle for a loss! You know you would lose....i know you would lose. It's mutha****ing over!