Fighters Who Often Get Called A ATG, But You Don't Think They Are?

[Southpaw16BF]

Well????????????????

[Joey Giardello]

Well????????????????

Jose napoles
Joe Fraizer

[Southpaw16BF]

Jose napoles
Joe Fraizer

Wow, pretty shocked, there Joey.

Reasons for not feeling that Frazier and Napoles are ATG Fighters?

I real feel the two were.........

[tysonali]

Jose napoles

Absolutely ridiculous.

Napoles dominated the welterweight division for 6 years and beat HOF's in Emile Griffith and Curtis Cokes.

Napoles' win over Griffith is a lot better than Monzon's (who you have at a ridiculous #9 on your ATG list in your sig) win over Griffith.

Napoles was also schooling Monzon in the early part of their fight, up until he ran out of stamina because of moving up a division.

[Southpaw16BF]

Absolutely ridiculous.

Napoles dominated the welterweight division for 6 years and beat HOF's in Emile Griffith and Curtis Cokes.

Napoles' win over Griffith is a lot better than Monzon's (who you have at a ridiculous #9 on your ATG list in your sig) win over Griffith.

Napoles was also schooling Monzon in the early part of their fight, up until he ran out of stamina because of moving up a division.

Nah. As much as I like Napoles, he wasn't greater than Monzon.

And Napoles was hardly ''schooling'' Monzon in the early going. In the early going Monzon was just finding his rythem, Monzon was never a fast starter.

[Joey Giardello]

Wow, pretty shocked, there Joey.

Reasons for not feeling that Frazier and Napoles are ATG Fighters?

I real feel the two were.........

Both were great fighters, but when someone say's ATG fighters i think of the 2 sugar rays, , armstrong, ali, pep, duran, monzon, marciano, joe lois, harry greb and sam langford. Also besides the win over ali who had only 1 fight in nearly 4 years, joe's resume is a bit week. Also i rate butter high but i dont think he was in the same league as the fighters above. But hey thats just my thoughts, you asked a question i gave you my answers, i konw alot of frazier fans are not gonna like it!

[tysonali]

Nah. As much as I like Napoles, he wasn't greater than Monzon.

And Napoles was hardly ''schooling'' Monzon in the early going. In the early going Monzon was just finding his rythem, Monzon was never a fast starter.

If Napoles' stamina didn't wear out, due to fighting at middleweight, he would've schooled Monzon for the rest of the fight.

[Joey Giardello]

Absolutely ridiculous.

Napoles dominated the welterweight division for 6 years and beat HOF's in Emile Griffith and Curtis Cokes.

Napoles' win over Griffith is a lot better than Monzon's (who you have at a ridiculous #9 on your ATG list in your sig) win over Griffith.

Napoles was also schooling Monzon in the early part of their fight, up until he ran out of stamina because of moving up a division.

lol napoles was schooling monzon as soon as monzon found his range he used napoles head as a speed ball he could not miss him with the right hand, napoles was a 15 round fighter he did not run out of gas! he just got beat down! Monzon stopped griffith in there first fight something napoles didnt do! so i dont know about his win over emile being better than monzon's. i rate butter hight but napoles was great! but he was not a atg!

[bojangles1987]

Joe Frazier is an unquestionable ATG. I cannot see how anyone can dispute that.

[tysonali]

lol napoles was schooling monzon as soon as monzon found his range he used napoles head as a speed ball he could not miss him with the right hand, napoles was a 15 round fighter he did not run out of gas! he just got beat down! Monzon stopped griffith in there first fight something napoles didnt do! so i dont know about his win over emile being better than monzon's. i rate butter hight but napoles was great! but he was not a atg!

Griffith won his first world title at welterweight and Napoles beat him at welterweight. Not to mention that he fought a younger version of Griffith than Monzon did.