Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Emile Griffith - Benny Paret 3 - the blood bath

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Emile Griffith - Benny Paret 3 - the blood bath

    It was lineal welterweight championship fight back in 1962



    Why the hell was Griffith allowed to punish Paret so bad? Paret dies 10 day later.

    The judge should have stopped it. Paret`s corner should have stopped it.

    #2
    I watched this fight in real time on TV.

    Comment


      #3
      Terrible fight to watch.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
        It was lineal welterweight championship fight back in 1962



        Why the hell was Griffith allowed to punish Paret so bad? Paret dies 10 day later.

        The judge should have stopped it. Paret`s corner should have stopped it.
        The preceding Fullmer beatdown was apparently even worse... and the actual reason why Paret died.

        Paret was known to rebound from severe abuse and win.

        Fighting of the era was significantly more violent. It was a much meaner sport. Also, guys like Graham and Archer were penalized simply for not being violent enough.

        Have you not see the Griffith-Archer fights? Right or wrong, today Archer would have run away with that fight on the score cards. But then fans wanted blood. The Griffith-Paret fight wasn't particularly unusual.

        Comment


          #5
          there wasn't any blood

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
            The preceding Fullmer beatdown was apparently even worse... and the actual reason why Paret died.

            Paret was known to rebound from severe abuse and win.

            Fighting of the era was significantly more violent. It was a much meaner sport. Also, guys like Graham and Archer were penalized simply for not being violent enough.

            Have you not see the Griffith-Archer fights? Right or wrong, today Archer would have run away with that fight on the score cards. But then fans wanted blood. The Griffith-Paret fight wasn't particularly unusual.
            The Fulmer fight was fought in a phone booth. Actually an excellent fight to watch. But I hardly believe it was the reason Parent died against Griffith and I've never heard anyone else claim this not seen any proof. Paret dies because he took (from my count) 24 unanswered punched where the ref should have jumped in much sooner.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
              It was lineal welterweight championship fight back in 1962



              Why the hell was Griffith allowed to punish Paret so bad? Paret dies 10 day later.

              The judge should have stopped it. Paret`s corner should have stopped it.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                The Fulmer fight was fought in a phone booth. Actually an excellent fight to watch. But I hardly believe it was the reason Parent died against Griffith and I've never heard anyone else claim this not seen any proof. Paret dies because he took (from my count) 24 unanswered punched where the ref should have jumped in much sooner.
                I disagree . . . the 12 months leading up to Paret's demise was a brutal period. He fought Griffith three times, squeezing out one very tough SD and being KOed twice. The Fullmer fight (overweight at MW) was a mere three months before the third Griffith fight and he suffered three knock downs during that fight. Too much action, too many punches in too short a period of time.

                I think it was a culmination of abuse; I think his people were using him up for what money they could get fast.

                Anyway, I have run across writers who claimed they saw that Paret was damaged goods after Fullmer, but of course they were using 20-20 hindsight, so who knows. But that was a brutal 12 months.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
                  I disagree . . . the 12 months leading up to Paret's demise was a brutal period. He fought Griffith three times, squeezing out one very tough SD and being KOed twice. The Fullmer fight (overweight at MW) was a mere three months before the third Griffith fight and he suffered three knock downs during that fight. Too much action, too many punches in too short a period of time.

                  I think it was a culmination of abuse; I think his people were using him up for what money they could get fast.

                  Anyway, I have run across writers who claimed they saw that Paret was damaged goods after Fullmer, but of course they were using 20-20 hindsight, so who knows. But that was a brutal 12 months.
                  Could it have been an accumulation of abuse? Absolutely possible. Was it? I would have to say no without any forensic backup. I don't disagree with the premise, but the statement it was the Fulmer fight that killed him. Was it the Mancini fight that killed Kim or his previous fights? Garcia vs Ruelas? The list goes on.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
                    It was lineal welterweight championship fight back in 1962



                    Why the hell was Griffith allowed to punish Paret so bad? Paret dies 10 day later.

                    The judge should have stopped it. Paret`s corner should have stopped it.
                    Definitely. It's very hard to watch and I can't imagine it being allowed to happen today.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP