Originally posted by The Defecator
In terms of top end successful football managers it would be a struggle to find an elite one who wasn't emotionally led because all of them are a few months of poor results away from the sack.
That isn't to say your model isn't used when adjusting for fans expectations. See Burnley. Typically Kompany would have been sacked and a relegation 'specialist' would have been thrown in as a hail Mary to keep them up.
The issue, specifically at Chelsea, is that they are a global club purchased for billions and finishing nowhere can't be tolerated for very long because of an associated drop in status and ultimately value. Chelsea whilst the fancy West London club aren't a disaster proof giant like Manchester United. In order to be at football's top table they need to be able to win.
It isn't quite s.hit or bust but probably nearly is. So for them, I just can't see patience being a virtue when it comes to managers.
If Chelsea finish 8th say even with recent improvement it would be a hard sell going into a new season with what will have to be the same players. It is largely perception but the slide into mediocrity will have been established.
I accept a manager is the tip of iceberg when it comes to Chelsea's issues but it will remain a vulnerable position unless a winning team can materialise.
It may never, of course. In which case - the fans are p.issed off in perpetuity (I usually am tbf) and the owners end up with a depreciating asset.
Comment