Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miscondeptions About Derek Chauvin Charges Explained

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    It wouldn't have had to go on at all if you weren't obviously triggered.

    You have a problem with me giving accurate information?
    Well you�re �obviously triggered? or you wouldn�t have taken exception. Now you go on to dismiss being �triggered?and tell me how I�m �triggered? because claiming someone is mentally distressed means you�re �winning?

    You�re wrong about it not having to go on at all, with you involved, that�s an impossibility.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
      Well you’re “obviously triggered”, or you wouldn’t have taken exception. Now you go on to dismiss being “triggered” and tell me how I’m “triggered”, because claiming someone is mentally distressed means you’re “winning”.

      You’re wrong about it not having to go on at all, with you involved, that’s an impossibility.
      You're right.

      I'm triggered that instead of you commenting on the substance of the post, you had to come in with your pvssy bleeding because you dislike me.

      Your feminine tendencies just couldn't let you pass up a chance to attack me instead of looking at the information and appreciating it for what it is, or just minding your business and shutting the fvvck up. Check yourself and your feminine ways. For the record, I don't give a shlt what you think about me, and for future reference, don't need you to go out or your way to try to let me know. Capisce?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        You're right.

        I'm triggered that instead of you commenting on the substance of the post, you had to come in with your pvssy bleeding because you dislike me.

        Your feminine tendencies just couldn't let you pass up a chance to attack me instead of looking at the information and appreciating it for what it is, or just minding your business and shutting the fvvck up. Check yourself and your feminine ways. For the record, I don't give a shlt what you think about me, and for future reference, don't need you to go out or your way to try to let me know. Capisce?
        Well thanks for admitting that, and the introduction of weak personal insults just removed any doubt as to you being �triggered? I guess I �win? Yay!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
          Well thanks for admitting that, and the introduction of weak personal insults just removed any doubt as to you being �triggered? I guess I �win? Yay!
          What doubt would there be?

          I just said I'm triggered that you decided to come in and make a thread that is clearly not about me...about me.

          Yes. You win the Obsession award. Yay! Hope that makes you happy.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            What doubt would there be?

            I just said I'm triggered that you decided to come in and make a thread that is clearly not about me...about me.

            Yes. You win the Obsession award. Yay! Hope that makes you happy.
            Yes, I�m ecstatic. Carry on with your L.

            Btw, what I posted was mostly in jest. It�s just funny to me that you authoritatively post about so many topics, when it�s clear you just did a little reading online.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
              Yes, I’m ecstatic. Carry on with your L.

              Btw, what I posted was mostly in jest. It’s just funny to me that you authoritatively post about so many topics, when it’s clear you just did a little reading online.
              What are you trying to say? That I shouldn't do reading online?


              Did I try to say that this shlt just comes naturally to me??? What the fvcck are you on?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                It wouldn't have had to go on at all if you weren't obviously triggered.

                You have a problem with me giving accurate information?
                It's always funny when the SJW's pull out the "triggered" word which was pretty much designed for them.

                I don't see anybody triggered here, not even you to be honest, you are communicating fairly rationally and clearly.

                We are just going to have to agree to disagree, I don't think Floyd was murdered and I find it distasteful that the left are using his death as a political tool. I mean that much is obvious. If you want to buy into it well more fool you.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Earl-Hickey View Post
                  It's always funny when the SJW's pull out the "triggered" word which was pretty much designed for them.

                  I don't see anybody triggered here, not even you to be honest, you are communicating fairly rationally and clearly.

                  We are just going to have to agree to disagree, I don't think Floyd was murdered and I find it distasteful that the left are using his death as a political tool. I mean that much is obvious. If you want to buy into it well more fool you.
                  Sure, we can agree to disagree. Hard to say he wasn't murdered, though, when the manner of death given on two autopsies say, "Homicide."

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                    What are you trying to say? That I shouldn't do reading online?


                    Did I try to say that this shlt just comes naturally to me??? What the fvcck are you on?
                    No, I�m saying most of the shyt you endlessly argue about on here, you�re not even well versed in. Wikipedia warrior lol.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
                      No, I’m saying most of the shyt you endlessly argue about on here, you’re not even well versed in. Wikipedia warrior lol.
                      Sorry to disappoint you. None of the information came from Wiki.

                      How would I become well versed in the criminal code in Minnesota without reading it? Or in the details of this case? Do share, since you have a problem with how I learn information.

                      How do you learn all the shlt that you get wrong here, hmm?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP