Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poor people not allowed in AOC's new luxury apartment complex

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #31
    Typical solcialist behavior. Do as a I say, but not as I do.

    Comment

      #32
      Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
      cuz he pointed out her hypocrisy?


      and she LEFT the bronx at the age of 5 and lived where the rich people did

      she talks about being poor like the community etc but she openend up a publishing firm.....

      how the hell do you "struggle" and open a business at the same time?
      He pointed out nothing. Has she ever been against living in "luxury" apartments? Where do you expect her to live? In a ****roach infested $1k studio?

      Seems to me like you kids don't even know what hypocrite means.

      Comment

        #33
        Why would any luxury apt allow in poor people ?

        Who wants to chase down their money ?

        Comment

          #34
          Free college education/Don't pay back loans
          Luxury apt for cheap

          Comment

            #35
            Originally posted by Lords View Post
            He pointed out nothing. Has she ever been against living in "luxury" apartments? Where do you expect her to live? In a ****roach infested $1k studio?

            Seems to me like you kids don't even know what hypocrite means.
            who ever said anything about a roach cheap studio? Cuz I sure didnt.....

            you'd think since she's for the people she would live in an area thats not associated with "high class" etc like the one she lives in now..... but thats whats she's used to since she isnt aoc from the bronx.... shes aoc from westchester

            Comment

              #36
              Originally posted by Rip Chudd View Post
              You can't handle a girl from the Bronx either
              again.... she aint from the bronx left at age 5 never returned until after HS

              Comment

                #37
                Originally posted by Lords View Post
                He pointed out nothing. Has she ever been against living in "luxury" apartments? Where do you expect her to live? In a ****roach infested $1k studio?

                Seems to me like you kids don't even know what hypocrite means.
                Man, that's some serious superfan cheerleading there.

                You're gonna give MCC a run for his money in terms of being the head cheerleader for Team D.

                Comment

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Curtis Harper View Post
                  Why would any luxury apt allow in poor people ?

                  Who wants to chase down their money ?
                  Good question.

                  In some cases, it's actually mandated by law, believe it or not.

                  In Austin, this is very common. Its mandated what percentage of units must be for low income people.

                  If you refuse, you simply dont get a building permit.

                  For whatever reason, its not a very well known policy. I actually know people who live in very expensive apartments who have no idea they share their complex with welfare ****.


                  Austin also does it with houses too. Last place we lived I heard we had welfare **** living down the street in subsidized city housing.

                  We had no idea, as the house looked normal enough, no signs or anything. But when we ran a search for the property owner, sure enough it came back the city owned that house.

                  We were paying around $1500/month and we had welfare **** a few houses down living for free. Screw that.

                  We didnt stay there too long.

                  Comment

                    #39
                    Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
                    Good question.

                    In some cases, it's actually mandated by law, believe it or not.

                    In Austin, this is very common. Its mandated what percentage of units must be for low income people.

                    If you refuse, you simply dont get a building permit.

                    For whatever reason, its not a very well known policy. I actually know people who live in very expensive apartments who have no idea they share their complex with welfare ****.


                    Austin also does it with houses too. Last place we lived I heard we had welfare **** living down the street in subsidized city housing.

                    We had no idea, as the house looked normal enough, no signs or anything. But when we ran a search for the property owner, sure enough it came back the city owned that house.

                    We were paying around $1500/month and we had welfare **** a few houses down living for free. Screw that.

                    We didnt stay there too long.
                    It's the same here. They just added apartment buildings a mile away. State forced it and they are next to $600k homes.

                    Comment

                      #40
                      Originally posted by man down View Post
                      It's the same here. They just added apartment buildings a mile away. State forced it and they are next to $600k homes.
                      I'm stunned this is legal.

                      I dont see how the government can force a property owner to rent his property out based on government mandates over income.

                      It's his property, so the choice should be his alone. Period.

                      I do know in some places you can actually pay your way out, which I'd wager is what the apartment building in question here did.

                      You simply pay a fine, but you avoid the hassle of renting to welfare ****. Of course it's no small fine.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP