Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

    Because it's the truth why tf else would I say it
    Actually, you're lying.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Gary Coleman View Post

      Actually, you're lying.
      No you are.

      Comment


        Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

        Buds just crying Pac s had a greater career and ww campaign than him. Of course everyone is taking into account pac started as light flyweight, of course that factors in it
        That's all it is. Crawford in a recent interview is blaming black folks for not buying his fights.

        Comment


          Originally posted by djtmal View Post

          It's not my feeling it is what it is.

          Thurman was the unified champ never lost either belt in the ring when Manny beat him. That is a fact son.

          You live your life through boxrec
          It is LITERALLY your feeling.

          Thurman was the #3 ranked WW at that time, that's a FACT.

          You "feel" he was "the best" but facts don't care about your feelings dumbass.

          Comment


            Originally posted by djtmal View Post

            Just answer the f'king questions the way I asked and keep your little snide remarks to yourself
            I just answered your question in that post, you dumb cunt.

            Comment


              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



              Thurman was the #3 ranked WW at that time, that's a FACT.
              He was also unified champ was stripped of one belt. That's a fact as well

              So he he had claim to the #1 spot lying Dan

              Comment


                Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                He was also unified champ was stripped of one belt. That's a fact as well

                So he he had claim to the #1 spot lying Dan
                So he had one belt, not two.

                He didn't have a claim, he was #3. That is where he was ranked. That is a fact. The number 3 means he was the third best, it has two numbers ahead of it known as #1 and #2.

                I can't make that easier for your dumbass to understand. I know your parents are inbred siblings but it's really not that hard.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                  Let me guess. It was Khan's fault

                  He's not getting any credit for that farce
                  Khan deserves worldwide humiliation for quitting like a coward instead of giving us another highlight knockout. He quit because he was scared to get absolutely destroyed by Crawford.
                  TheProudLunatic TheProudLunatic likes this.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                    Like Illegalivweather
                    It warms my heart how you Pac Bois REFUSE to say if they would run crying from random blood tests !!!!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by LittleLucy View Post

                      Pacquiao being Pinoy has nothing to do with anything. On the contrary, If Pacman was American, he'd be regarded as the GOAT for what he did and who he beat being the smaller fighter!
                      Here's how a fan base works....
                      You get a greater share when you are the LONE rep
                      Fck it
                      If a person can't understand basic common sense

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP