Originally posted by djtmal
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
Buds just crying Pac s had a greater career and ww campaign than him. Of course everyone is taking into account pac started as light flyweight, of course that factors in it
Comment
-
Originally posted by djtmal View Post
It's not my feeling it is what it is.
Thurman was the unified champ never lost either belt in the ring when Manny beat him. That is a fact son.
You live your life through boxrec
Thurman was the #3 ranked WW at that time, that's a FACT.
You "feel" he was "the best" but facts don't care about your feelings dumbass.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by djtmal View Post
He was also unified champ was stripped of one belt. That's a fact as well
So he he had claim to the #1 spot lying Dan
He didn't have a claim, he was #3. That is where he was ranked. That is a fact. The number 3 means he was the third best, it has two numbers ahead of it known as #1 and #2.
I can't make that easier for your dumbass to understand. I know your parents are inbred siblings but it's really not that hard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by djtmal View Post
Let me guess. It was Khan's fault
He's not getting any credit for that farceTheProudLunatic likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LittleLucy View Post
Pacquiao being Pinoy has nothing to do with anything. On the contrary, If Pacman was American, he'd be regarded as the GOAT for what he did and who he beat being the smaller fighter!
You get a greater share when you are the LONE rep
Fck it
If a person can't understand basic common sense
Comment
Comment