Thurman has very underrated resume

[djtmal]

He was ranked #1 by every ranking system there was, most importantly The Ring Magazine which was been doing the boxing rankings for over 100 years.

They get it wrong and you believed them.

Why was the alleged #1 ww in the world a beaten man after 5, 6 rounds

[IronDanHamza]

They get it wrong and you believed them.

Why was the alleged #1 ww in the world a beaten man after 5, 6 rounds

What do you mean, "alleged"? Do you not understand how rankings work? Fighters get ranked in positions, that is their rankings. That's isn't an allegation, or up for debate. It's a fact.

Spence was ranked #1 at WW in 2019, and also before the Crawford fight. That's a fact. There's nothing to "believe or disbelieve" It is a FACT.

What kind of argument are you trying to make? That someone can't be ranked #1 if they lose in dominant fashion? What kind of ****** argument is that?

You know when Manny Pacquaio fight Ricky Hatton, Ricky Hatton was ranked #1 at that time. And in that fight, Hatton for annihilated in two rounds. Does that magically mean he wasn't #1 at 140 at that time? No, obviously not.

The same when Pacquaio fought Barrera at 126, Barrera was #1 at 126, and Pacquaio won every round and stopped him. Does that magically mean Barrera wasn't #1 at 126 at the time? No, obviously not.

I could make a day of giving examples of that. #1 ranked fighters losing in dominant fashion, it's happened a plethora of times. Nothing will change that before that fight they were the #1 ranked fighter like Spence was in 2019 up to the fight vs Crawford.

The fact this even needs explaining is mind numbing. You really are that thick.

And on top of that, you said I made excuses for Spence.

NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 6th time of asking.

I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.

[djtmal]

What do you mean, "alleged"?

Exactly what I said alleged.

Somebody was allegedly the #1 ww in the world, and he gets totally shut out and stopped in 8 9 rounds, then he wasn't really the #1 ww in the world now was he

[IronDanHamza]

Exactly what I said alleged.

Somebody was allegedly the #1 ww in the world, and he gets totally shut out and stopped in 8 9 rounds, then he wasn't really the #1 ww in the world now was he

I don't think you know what the word alleged means.

You're either ranked in that position, or you're not. They aren't allgedly ranked there, they just are.

I've just given you two examples of previous #1 ranked fighters being shut out and stopped. I could make a day of it, it's happened a plehtora of times. The fact you seem to think someone can't be ranked #1 if they lose in dominant fashion is just unbelievably bizarre, and stupid. Spence was ranked #1 in 2019, all the way up to his loss to Crawford. If it hasn't sunk into your head at this point it's not going to.

And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 7th time of asking.

I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.

[djtmal]

I don't think you know what the word alleged means.

;

Oh I take that back.

He was alleged #1 after he got the brakes beat off him. That put him in the hypejob category.

[IronDanHamza]

Oh I take that back.

He was alleged #1 after he got the brakes beat off him. That put him in the hypejob category.

No he wasn't the alleged #1 after he lost, Crawford was then #1 at WW. Previously it was Spence, then Crawford beat him and then he was then moved to the #1 position. These aren't "alleged" ranking positions you stupid retard.

Was Hatton #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera #1 at 126 when Barrera beat him?

Was Joe Frazier #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 8th time of asking.

I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.

[djtmal]

No he wasn't the alleged #1 after he lost;

Yes he was he was allegedly #1 then he got the mutha luvin brakes beat off him, now he is a hypejob.

Has he even practiced since he got the brakes beat off him

That's been what 5 years ago seemed like

Could you imagine, Tommy Hearns being the #1 ww in the world, then Sugar Ray comes along, and splatters him in 5 rounds.

[IronDanHamza]

Yes he was he was allegedly #1 then he got the mutha luvin brakes beat off him, now he is a hypejob.

Has he even practiced since he got the brakes beat off him

That's been what 5 years ago seemed like

Ok since you literally just didn't address anything I said I'll just ask again and see if you can muster a response;

No he wasn't the alleged #1 after he lost, Crawford was then #1 at WW. Previously it was Spence, then Crawford beat him and then he was then moved to the #1 position. These aren't "alleged" ranking positions you stupid retard.

Was Hatton #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera #1 at 126 when Barrera beat him?

Was Joe Frazier #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 8th time of asking.

I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.

[djtmal]

Ok since you literally just didn't address anything I said

;

Who cares about what you said

Spence was a hypejob at ww

[IronDanHamza]

Who cares about what you said

Spence was a hypejob at ww

Well you should because it directly breaks down why the point you're trying to make is extremely stupid.

So let's try again shall we and see if you can attempt to respond with the 2 brain cells you have floating in there;

No he wasn't the alleged #1 after he lost, Crawford was then #1 at WW. Previously it was Spence, then Crawford beat him and then he was then moved to the #1 position. These aren't "alleged" ranking positions you stupid retard.

Was Hatton #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera #1 at 126 when Pacqauio beat him?

Was Joe Frazier #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger #1 when Bob Foster beat him?

Are all the above hype jobs because they were shut out and stopped whilst being ranked #1 in their division?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights? No obviously it doesn't. What part of that don't you understand? It's beyond bizarre and retarded.




And furthermore, what does any of that have to do with you saying I made excuses for Spence. What excuses?

NAME ONE EXCUSE I MADE FOR SPENCE. This is now the 8th time of asking.

I won't let you run away from this pathetic lie you've attempted to tell. Name the excuse I made for Spence.