Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Froch an ATG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #21
    Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
    Did you honestly just try to compare Froch to Hearns???
    I don't see why that comparison is so far fetched. Froch has had his back against the wall more times than Hearns had, and won, whereas Hearns lost most of the times - arguably to better fighters, yet that shouldn't take away from Froch's achievements.

    Comment

      #22
      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
      I don't see why that comparison is so far fetched. Froch has had his back against the wall more times than Hearns had, and won, whereas Hearns lost most of the times - arguably to better fighters, yet that shouldn't take away from Froch's achievements.

      Comment

        #23
        surefire HOFer, but not ATG.

        Comment

          #24
          Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
          Are you planning on debating or just acting like a child?

          Comment

            #25
            Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
            Your debating skills are exemplary.

            Comment

              #26
              Depends how you define ATG but no, he would need to at least be No.1 in his weight class

              He'll probably get in the HOF.

              Comment

                #27
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                Depends how you define ATG but no, he would need to at least be No.1 in his weight class

                He'll probably get in the HOF.
                He will undoubtedly get in the HOF.

                Comment

                  #28
                  No not even HOF, and you campare him to hearns?! Tommy is the first man to win 5 titles in 5 different division, one of the best WW who fight in WW best era, produce 3 FOTY and multiple nominations, has resume full of ATG and HOF, has one of the most lethal weapon in boxing (his righthand and flicker jab), multiple exciting rivalry through-out his career.

                  Really?? you compare Froch with Hearns??
                  Last edited by betmen; 10-23-2014, 06:36 PM.

                  Comment

                    #29
                    HOF.

                    He's a bad man.

                    Comment

                      #30
                      Originally posted by betmen View Post
                      No not even second ballot HOF, and you campare him to hearns?! Tommy is the first man to win 5 titles in 5 different division, one of the best WW who fight in WW best era, produce 3 FOTY and multiple nominations, has resume full of ATG and HOF, has one of the most lethal weapon in boxing (his righthand and flicker jab), multiple exciting rivalry through-out his career.

                      Really?? you compare Froch with Hearns??
                      lol, you're kidding yourself. Froch is clearly a first ballot, maybe second ballot hall of famer.

                      Adrien Broner also won belts in 3-4 divisions or whatever it is. Who did he beat?

                      Hearns is undoubtedly a great fighter, in terms of quality wins I'm just asking why it's so far-fetched to compare him to someone who has stacked up an impeccable resume 15 world title fights on the spin, incl. beaten multiple past, current and future champions.

                      Hearns has a good resume: Cuevas at 147, Duran at 154, Benitez at 154, Andries, Roldan, and Virgil Hill at 160 to 175.... Maybe should have had Ray Leonard as well.

                      I just don't feel like it's definitely better than Froch. And if it is, it's not out of his stratosphere..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP