Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which of these 2 fighters who avoided Khan is more excusable: Pacquiao or Bradley?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Which of these 2 fighters who avoided Khan is more excusable: Pacquiao or Bradley?

    Which ducker is more forgiveable:

    Bradley for ducking the 140 unification bout with Khan and instead fighting a c-level Kendall Holt back in 2009

    Or

    Pacquiao for ducking Khan and fighting Bradley for the 3rd time tonight?

    #2
    Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
    Which ducker is more forgiveable:

    Bradley for ducking the 140 unification bout with Khan and instead fighting a c-level Kendall Holt back in 2009

    Or

    Pacquiao for ducking Khan and fighting Bradley for the 3rd time tonight?



    The IBF ordered a final welterweight eliminator to produce the mandatory challenger for Kell Brook between Timothy Bradley Jr. and Amir Khan. However, according to the IBF, Khan declined to participate. Instead, Khan appears headed to a May 30 bout against former titleholder Chris Algieri. Khan could have had a June 13 shot at Brook without fighting the eliminator, but he also declined that bout, a huge fight in their home country of England. Since Khan declined, the next ranked fighter who will be offered the opportunity to face Bradley in the eliminator is Frankie Gavin, Khan's countryman.


    [IMG]http://media.*****.com/media/QgixZj4y3TwnS/*****.gif[/IMG]

    Comment


      #3
      No one has ever been scared of Khan lol

      Comment


        #4
        Bradley is worse and it's not close

        Bradley's is waaayyy worse.

        Pac just didn't acknowledge Khan and Bob said he price himself out... That's a passive duck if you can say that but considering since Hatton Pac has only fought 2 now TR fighters ... You can cal it al holding pattern more than duck. Also Khan hasn't done anything since the Garcia loss to earn Pac.


        Bradley straight pussed out of fighting with Khan in a legacy fight ,to fight Casamayor. Not only was it a career high pay day but it was for all the marbles at 140, he would of been the undisputed champ if he won which would of helped him in his Pacquiao negotiations ( hell might even have caught the eye of Floyd). He admitted he might lose and ditched his promoter to not fight Khan. Also the he WBC stripped him of the title for him ducking Khan that's how bad his was.

        Comment


          #5
          I don't think Bradley ducked Khan at all. He was trying to make the move to Top Rank at the time and fighting Khan just wasn't going to happen due to all the TR/GBP stuff after that.
          At the time it looked like he was ducking but he made the right choice. Got 3 Pacquiao paydays as well as a Marquez PPV bout while Khan is just now in his first PPV main event.
          Bradley knew it was unlikely that Floyd would fight him but TR was all too willing to let him fight Pac. He is one of the top 5-10 paid guys in the sport right now and if he wins tonight he still has a few good paydays ahead of him.
          I think Roach knows Khan would and still give Pacquiao problems with his length and size. More likely Pacquaio catches him and takes him out but that was not a certainty. Was and is a risky fight for Pac.

          Comment


            #6
            Pacquaio.

            Bradley straight out ducked him ..

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
              Which of these 2 fighters who avoided Khan is more excusable: Pacquiao or Bradley?

              Which ducker is more forgiveable:

              Bradley for ducking the 140 unification bout with Khan and instead fighting a c-level Kendall Holt back in 2009

              Or

              Pacquiao for ducking Khan and fighting Bradley for the 3rd time tonight?
              ... The third: Floyd Mayweather Jr...

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP