Originally posted by therealpugilist
View Post
Froch has a very nice record, he was a willy fighter in perfect shape with a strong mind wich allowed him to grab wins over Taylor, Direll and Pascal despite losing the first half of the fight in many cases.
But honnestly, Froch was a limited fighter, he was sloppy and slow IMO.
Kessler was more responsible defensively than Froch but couldn't adjust in fights, that's why Forch beat him in the rematch, Forch being smarter as a fighter.
Kovalev IMO, is a more complete fighter than both Kessler and Froch.
He's not slow or sloppy, he can think in the ring and is very responsible defensively.
Also, I think he's a much more efficient puncher.
Comment