Originally posted by DaBeastO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dmitry Bivol is a promotional free agent..... Huh?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by KTFOKING View PostHe's said on plenty of occasions that Matchroom USA fighters can only fight on DAZN.
He's said that DAZN have exclusive rights to all shows promoted by Matchroom USA. That's a different thing altogether.
If a Matchroom fighter fights on a show promoted by somebody else, who doesn't have an exclusivity deal with DAZN, then DAZN have no rights to that fight.
Originally posted by KTFOKING View PostAnd Jacobs didn't just sign a Matchroom USA deal, he also signed a three fight deal exclusively with DAZN, so no, he can't fight elsewhere.Last edited by kafkod; 04-19-2019, 11:59 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostNo, Hearn has never said that!
He's said that DAZN have exclusive rights to all shows promoted by Matchroom USA. That's a different thing altogether.
If a Matchroom fighter fights on a show promoted by somebody else, who doesn't have an exclusivity deal with DAZN, then DAZN have no rights to that fight.
I don't know about any exclusivity deal between Jacobs and DAZN. but if there is one, then that's not a Matchroom exclusivity deal. Like I said, DAZN and Matchroom are 2 different entities.
You are using semantics right now. He said his Matchroom USA fighters will be exclusive to DAZN. If Bivol signed a deal with Matchroom USA, then he wouldn't be a promotional FA, he would be fighting just on DAZN.
Jacobs absolutely inked a deal with Matchroom USA and DAZN.
I believe this is the link, but Jacobs mentions he has a three fight deal with DAZN.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostIf Bivol is signed with Matchroom and talking about fighting on ESPN, then how does that fit with what you were saying to me about Matchroom fighters only being allowed to fight on DAZN?
Bivol will appear exclusively on sports streaming service DAZN, where Hearn has a long-term contract.
So how did we get to the point he is now a network free agent? Was Rafael's original report wrong? Is Bivol's deal written up differently giving him the option to fight on other networks? Was Rafael wrong with this report that Bivol is a network free agent?
Comment
-
Originally posted by EasternEuroFan View PostWarren loves a court case. His Lawyer must be raking it in.
Frank won both cases - for loss of earnings and damages - but didn't get any money out of it because Burns and his trainer both declared themselves bankrupt.
Frank tried to get out of paying his lawyers because he said that, as he didn't get any money from the cases, neither should they. The court found against him though and ordered him to pay up. The Devil looks after his own!
Comment
-
Originally posted by KTFOKING View PostHis deal could be done differently. But when his deal was first signed, this is what Rafael reported:
So how did we get to the point he is now a network free agent? Was Rafael's original report wrong? Is Bivol's deal written up differently giving him the option to fight on other networks? Was Rafael wrong with this report that Bivol is a network free agent?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by KTFOKING View PostNo one is saying they aren't different en******...And why the hell is enti ties blocked out? WTF BoxingScene.
You are using semantics right now. He said his Matchroom USA fighters will be exclusive to DAZN. If Bivol signed a deal with Matchroom USA, then he wouldn't be a promotional FA, he would be fighting just on DAZN.
Jacobs absolutely inked a deal with Matchroom USA and DAZN.
I believe this is the link, but Jacobs mentions he has a three fight deal with DAZN.
Danny Jacobs says there that he has a 3 fight deal with DAZN. One of those fights is against Canelo, and if he wins that one, another will be against GGG, who, like Canelo, also has a deal with DAZN.
Jacobs, Canelo and GGG are all tied to DAZN, not Matchroom.
Comment
-
So who and on what network is Bivol fighting next? It's been a month and a half almost since his last fight.
Comment
Comment