Which is Canelo's 'signature' win?

[j.razor]

His win over GGG was a blatant robbery so maybe Jacobs or Lara. And many had him losing to Lara lol

No it wasn't. You don't even have ANY proof but we do, its on video.

[j.razor]

He doesnt have any.

Cotto 35+, past prime and way too old, too small also
Lara, Canelo lost that fight, very controversial
GGG, dropped belt to avoid prime GGG, lost first fight to old GGG clearly, 2nd fight couldve been a draw at best
Mosley, 41 years old, shot
Jacobs, looked bad after having a war with GGG, very close fight, couldnt even drop Jacobs.

Canelo is a fabricated star, he is good but not nearwhere as good as boxing media tries to tell you. People just love to get manipulated, alot of mindless sheep out there.

Lara - Nelo won

Pvssy-G - Nelo whooped him twice. You don't get out of your prime in 1 year unless he was heavy on the PED's.

Jacobs - Jacobs beat Pvssy-G so it was only right Nelo fought Jacobs.

[Boxing_1013]

Most writers thought he lost the 2nd fight, but most boxers thought he won it.

We can all have our biases when scoring a fight...some of those boxers included...I think a lot of those guys were/are looking for any reason to score it/a fight against GGG since he was so dominant for so long, and had been hyped so much by some...all those boxers have egos and don't want to see anyone else, besides themselves, built up as the boogeyman...seems like they were itching, whether it was valid or not, to try and take him down a peg.

Also Nelo pretty clearly fought better in the 2nd fight...but round in and round out he was still getting outworked, I think that is pretty clear as well...I think some more neutral observers score that 2nd fight closer for Canelo since they want to appear reasonable and since the 2nd fight was more competitive...but yeah round by round I think both fights were similar scores and clear Ws for GGG.

[j.razor]

Kovalev would be if he clearly beats him. Besides that I guess Cotto as of now. There�s too many that thought GGG won both fights for it to be an actual signature win. Canelo, when I think about it outside of Cotto, never really clearly beat any of the top guys he�s faced. Jacobs, Trout, both GGG fights & the Lara fight were all really close.

No, only the media & 97k G-Tards say he won.

[j.razor]

Youre a piece of **** fan and a fangirl of the highest order that DKSAB yet you want people to waste their time watching film with you lmfao.

Are you that miserable?

You can always call call centers on the phone if you need someone to talk to.

Another Pvssy that won't prove it. No wonder you a Pvssy-G fan, Pvssy

[j.razor]

I would say Lara or Jacobs, based on fights I actually saw him win...never watched the Cotto fight and scored it...thought he lost both times to GGG.

If he legitimately beats Kovalev I would put that right up there with Lara and Jacobs though...a lot think Lara beat him but I had it 7-5 to Nelo and to me that is probably his best win...hard to say though because as much as I like Lara, he always makes his fights closer than they should be.

Nelo beat Pvssy-G twice & its not signature cuz Pvssy-G is a hype job.

[j.razor]

Bro...that's what it is like when you are a neutral observer, more or less, in a fight...you just call it like you see it lol...you can see a guy doing some good things and be impressed, but that doesn't mean he won enough rounds to win the fight on your card.

Like you don't have to completely love one guy and hate the other lol...just call it like you see it man, that's all any of us can do.

You not neutral & THAT'S the problem. You dudes wont even break down the fight on video.

[Eff Pandas]

Most writers thought he lost the 2nd fight, but most boxers thought he won it.

I think most boxers got too into the Mexican style bs. I get it. I thought Canelo won the battle with his coming forward all night, but that GGG jab won rounds & the fight. So most folks scoring rbr, whatever they do, thought GGG won both fights.

[j.razor]

Originally Posted by Murcielago
Most writers thought he lost the 2nd fight, but most boxers thought he won it.

We can all have our biases when scoring a fight...some of those boxers included...I think a lot of those guys were/are looking for any reason to score it/a fight against GGG since he was so dominant for so long, and had been hyped so much by some...all those boxers have egos and don't want to see anyone else, besides themselves, built up as the boogeyman...seems like they were itching, whether it was valid or not, to try and take him down a peg.

Also Nelo pretty clearly fought better in the 2nd fight...but round in and round out he was still getting outworked, I think that is pretty clear as well...I think some more neutral observers score that 2nd fight closer for Canelo since they want to appear reasonable and since the 2nd fight was more competitive...but yeah round by round I think both fights were similar scores and clear Ws for GGG.

You out your mind OR you just another liar. The bias comes from the writers who can't fight for shet & don't know shet bout boxing.

[j.razor]

I think most boxers got too into the Mexican style bs. I get it. I thought Canelo won the battle with his coming forward all night, but that GGG jab won rounds & the fight. So most folks scoring rbr, whatever they do, thought GGG won both fights.

Would you rather get jabbed or hooked in the face?? So why do you fools talk about Pvssy-G's jab when it was NOT even effective?!?! Idiots can't lie for shet