Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Manny fights and beats Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post

    FACT: Mayweather has 3x wins on his resume, that are far better than anything on Pac's resume

    .....
    You repeat this nonsense so much and I've ignored it as much as you've repeated it.
    But you've wore me down. Go on then please tell us what Floyds 3 great wins are then? Do your worst.
    Don't tell me its 70 fight former flyweight, and green cw nel o who wasn't really a top 10 pfp in most eyes and I can't even imagine who your 3rd choice is?
    But if it is these 2, don't bother responding and nobody wants to hear your 3rd choice
    Last edited by hugh grant; 08-01-2020, 05:48 PM.

    Comment


      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
      You repeat this nonsense so much and I've ignored it as much as you've repeated it.
      But you've wore me down. Go on then please tell us what Floyds 3 great wins are then? Do your worst.
      Don't tell me its 70 fight former flyweight, and green cw nel o who wasn't really a top 10 pfp in most eyes and I can't even imagine who your 3rd choice is?
      But if it is these 2, don't bother responding and nobody wants to hear your 3rd choice
      third is clearly baldomir. do you even need to ask that question?

      Comment


        no wait it can be mosley too! he was p4p #3! he was clearly an amazing fighter and deserved that status even though he barely beat mayorga and looked terrible. amnesia! when pac beat him he was shot but when floyd beat him he was amazing and a p4p talent. what a quick decline that was...every floyd opponent should just be installed as p4p #2 before the fight. makes things much easier

        Comment


          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          no wait it can be mosley too! he was p4p #3! he was clearly an amazing fighter and deserved that status even though he barely beat mayorga and looked terrible. amnesia! when pac beat him he was shot but when floyd beat him he was amazing and a p4p talent. what a quick decline that was...every floyd opponent should just be installed as p4p #2 before the fight. makes things much easier
          Yes his 3rd choice might be the 39 year SSM, who miraculously declined by the time pac got him a year later? Or it could be guerrero, didn't ring mag have him top10, only for guerrero to to drop out of top 10 like a sack of cement after floyd beat him. Floyd must have ruined guerrero, like he ruined hatton, ssm and dlh?

          Comment


            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            You repeat this nonsense so much and I've ignored it as much as you've repeated it.
            But you've wore me down. Go on then please tell us what Floyds 3 great wins are then? Do your worst.
            Don't tell me its 70 fight former flyweight, and green cw nel o who wasn't really a top 10 pfp in most eyes and I can't even imagine who your 3rd choice is?
            But if it is these 2, don't bother responding and nobody wants to hear your 3rd choice





            correct... correct... and a 12-round schooling of Marquez

            this is what happened to Sleepiao when he got in there with Marquez




            it did not take Mayweather 4 attempts to get decapitated by Marquez

            I mean seriously, Pac could never even distance himself from Marquez... and yet you clowns think that he is better Mayweather LMAO

            Comment


              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              correct... correct... and a 12-round schooling of Marquez

              this is what happened to Sleepiao when he got in there with Marquez




              it did not take Mayweather 4 attempts to get decapitated by Marquez

              I mean seriously, Pac could never even distance himself from Marquez... and yet you clowns think that he is better Mayweather LMAO
              The way you reason to justify your thoughts is a mystery. Pac s got 3 wins if not scorecard error, and floyd cheated scales whilst bloating jm m up 2 divisions.
              Yet you consider that a great win.? No wonder I've been ignoring you

              Comment


                Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
                I don't think any over 40 boxer has done that but I am not sure. I don't think Pac can beat Crawford. He is too small and too old. Crawford is too big, too young and too good. Just ask Horn. Beating a Thurman who has seen better days is one thing. Beating top pound for pound Crawford is much harder. Pac should leave Crawford alone and fight Mikey who is his size and a good fighter he can beat. Better yet Pac can retire for his health and enjoy his 200 million dollars and life after 40 without getting punched in the face and risking brain damage.
                The Thurman that Pac beat would beat any WW in the division. Never under estimate Pacquiao. Not a huge fan but he comes to fight regardless and is always a threat

                Comment


                  Would rewrite his history standings .

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    The way you reason to justify your thoughts is a mystery. Pac s got 3 wins if not scorecard error, and floyd cheated scales whilst bloating jm m up 2 divisions.
                    Yet you consider that a great win.? No wonder I've been ignoring you



                    ask pacwacko what he thinks

                    pacwacko thinks everything that Kellerman says is true

                    well, Kellerman thinks that Marquez won the first 3 fights

                    he definitely won the first fight... the judge scoring-error is just a excuse used by silly pacfans

                    Marquez won that fight by 2-3 points on my scorecard... and if we are going to fix the judges scoring errors, then we will deduct a point from Pacquiao for hitting Marquez when he was on the deck in round 1... you can get disqualified for that

                    that fight was even by about the half-way point... so if Marquez did not win, it is because he failed to close the show... not because of something that happened earlier... but yea, he closed the show just fine

                    never heard of a fighter knocking down his opponent THREE TIMES in the first round, and breaking his nose... and yet not even winning the fight LMAO... that is the biggest choke by a supposed top fighter in boxing history

                    imo, the second fight was a draw... that was Pac's best performance against Marquez, a superb effort

                    in a specific matchup Pacquiao vs Marquez, Marquez is a better fighter... historically, I give the edge to Pac, but not by much...

                    I only count Pac's fights under 135, and Mayweather... which are the only fights we know he was clean... Pac performed well against Mayweather, better than expected... and he is a first-ballot HOF'er for his performances in the lower weights... but compared head-to-head with Marquez, the Mexican is the better fighter imo

                    Marquez would have beaten all of those Top Rank JWW's, and he would have won all of those catchweights... JMM would have beaten Hoya/Cotto at 145, those guys were numb

                    put it this way... Marquez is a lot closer to Pacquiao, than Pacquiao is to Mayweather

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      The way you reason to justify your thoughts is a mystery. Pac s got 3 wins if not scorecard error, and floyd cheated scales whilst bloating jm m up 2 divisions.
                      Yet you consider that a great win.? No wonder I've been ignoring you



                      that version of JMM decapitated Pacquiao

                      double-standards like that... is why everyone ignores you

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP