Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tate Bros Charged With R@pe and Human Trafficking in UK!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by SouthpawRight View Post
    plenty of guys who have both h03s and wives

    Fame increases options but makes a man a target for self-serving h03s
    Yeah, not my point, again. I don't think anyone on this thread can actually read with comprehension, they can just read words but not understand. Except Madison.

    i'm saying his whole gig nowadays is telling young men to be strong and have discipline .

    He clearly doesn't practice what he preaches because part of his gig is talking about his insane amount of discipline, which is clearly a lie because he surrounds himself with the exact type of women he says he wouldn’t.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post
      he surrounds himself with the exact type of women he says he wouldn’t.
      I always thought it’s pretty clear that he’s a h03monger

      Dude first got rich by managing online strippers

      wild that anyone believed he’s only good girls

      Comment


        #23
        Good! Fuck those scumbags.
        Biledriver Biledriver likes this.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Madison Boxing View Post
          'A civil case brought by four women against Andrew Tate is believed to be a legal first, a barrister for his accusers has said.

          The women accuse Tate of ****, assault and coercive control between 2013 and 2015. One claims he threatened to kill her, another says he made clear he would kill anyone who spoke to her, and a third claims he convinced her he had killed others.

          In written submissions, Anne Studd KC said she believed this was the first case of its kind in which it is argued that coercive control amounted to "intentional infliction of harm" - a legal concept similar to emotional distress.

          Tate denies the claims, saying they are a "pack of lies" and "gross fabrications".

          The women are seeking damages "arising from the assaults, batteries, and infliction of intentional harm", their civil claim states.

          A case management hearing was held in London on Tuesday, which deals with preliminary matters and logistics.

          The court heard that a trial could be held in early 2027, and that it could last three weeks.

          Judge Richard Armstrong told the court the four women were "seeking damages likely to reach six figures".

          Proving the intentional infliction of harm would mean the claimants could be awarded additional damages.

          Vanessa Marshall KC, acting for Tate, told the court that they "accept in this day and age that coercive and controlling behaviour does exist", but that it was "really not the issue in this case".

          The case concerns incidents the four women allege took place in Luton and Hitchin.

          Two of the claimants worked for Tate's webcam business in 2015, while the other two were in relationships with him in 2013 and 2014.

          Three of the women previously reported Tate to the police, but in 2019 the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided not to bring criminal charges.'

          Make of this what you will lol.... a case so strong it was thrown out in 2019 but now resurfaces as a 'new legal first' which conveniently would provide more money for the women accusing him


          why no convictions for actual grooming gangs?

          grooming gangs are so accepted

          I’m beginning to think edophilia is apart of British culture

          Comment


            #25
            Brand is another one the British government is going after for humiliating them

            Comment


              #26
              Tommy Robinson is another Brit who got got for clowning the government

              Londonistan is an authoritarian state lecturing the world about freedom and democracy

              wen will Britainstan get itself Oreshniked

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by SouthpawRight View Post
                why no convictions for actual grooming gangs?

                grooming gangs are so accepted

                I’m beginning to think edophilia is apart of British culture
                is just our government, i dont know why we have the politicians we do... they arent reflective of the normal UK citizen

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post

                  Yeah, not my point, again. I don't think anyone on this thread can actually read with comprehension, they can just read words but not understand.
                  These are the types who have heard 'Born In The USA' 1000 times yet still think it's a patriotic anthem. They know what each individual word means but get confused trying to put it all together.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by SouthpawRight View Post
                    Brand is another one the British government is going after for humiliating them
                    this is the craziest one genuinely sinister

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP