Danny Garcia is getting a very little respect

[boliodogs]

Let's not forget the most important fact:

Danny Swift (slow) took 4 rounds to spark the chin of a prime Khan (fast).

After failing to spark the chin, Crawford took almost 10 rounds against a nearly-killed-by-Canelo version of Khan before sparking his balls in frustration.

That alone should be evidence that NSB tends to be hypocrites about fighters.

I thought Crawford beat the hell out of Khan and won every round. The low blow was accidental and certainly NOT THROWN IN FRUSTRATION.The punch landed on Khan's leg not his balls. Khan could have easily continued but he quit instead. It is clear from your past posts you don't like Crawford for some unknown reason. All he does is win and dominate and he totally dominated Khan from round one until Khan quit to keep from being KOed.

[JakeTheBoxer]

If Danny beats Spence ( not unlikely ), there is no point Spence fights Crawford, ever.

I mean, even pre-accidental Spence had very tough time with Porter. I feel like Danny, Porter, Thurman, Spence are the same level.

[xxlefthookxx]

I thought Crawford beat the hell out of Khan and won every round. The low blow was accidental and certainly NOT THROWN IN FRUSTRATION.The punch landed on Khan's leg not his balls. Khan could have easily continued but he quit instead. It is clear from your past posts you don't like Crawford for some unknown reason. All he does is win and dominate and he totally dominated Khan from round one until Khan quit to keep from being KOed.

Plus...Danny was losing every round to Khan until he landed the punch. Good for him, but should be viewed in the same light as Wilder vs Old Man Ducker.
Danny was also dominated by Thurman, and only competitive vs Porter. It's not like Thurman and Porter are world beaters...just good fighters.

[Mister Wolf]

He earned it by not showing up against Porter or Redkach.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Obviously Danny has fought (& clearly or dominantly beaten) some really good boxers. We wouldn't be talking about him otherwise.

That said the things the other poster mentioned can also be relevant to maybe why Danny is less respected by many.

As to the specifics the consensus here & most forums was Herrera got screwed.

If you look at:


You'll notice of the 17 guys who recorded their rbr scoring the lean on the outcome was 10-2-5 Herrera.

And again with the Salka thing opponent selection doesn't often become a punchline for jokes & memes so saying the Salka fight was just a stay busy type opponent doesn't really hold true. Salka was still FAR beneath a caliber of guy Danny should of been fighting even for a stay busy fight. Let's not act like this is unfair treatment when even legendary fighters like Mike Tyson (via Peter McNeely after his release among others) & JCC (via his stay busy Tijuana Taxi driver opponents) have had punchline opponents when they fought guys far beneath them. And plenty others have gotten sh^t for fighting guys far beneath their level.

I don't care how anyone else judges a fight,only how I see it..I did not see a robbery..I did however see a better fight then most was predicting we were going to see(mainly cause many people did not even know who Herrera was,not saying you)..

As for Salka,all I'm saying is everyone takes gummies fights..I can name a bunch in the same time period as Dannys..Khan fought McCloskey after he beat Maidana..Bradley fought Casamayor (who was finished at the time), Mayweather fought Ortiz(who had no business in the same ring with him at the time)..Etc Etc Etc list goes on and on..Only if you do not understand the history of this sport can you hold this fight against Danny..Again every fighter does this and to and extent it's understandable as long as this is not common practice..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Plus...Danny was losing every round to Khan until he landed the punch. Good for him, but should be viewed in the same light as Wilder vs Old Man Ducker.
Danny was also dominated by Thurman, and only competitive vs Porter. It's not like Thurman and Porter are world beaters...just good fighters.

Completely disagree with Garcia losing every Rd to Khan..The 2end Rd was extremely close and he clearly won the third Rd..

[Rome-By-Ko]

I thought Crawford beat the hell out of Khan and won every round. The low blow was accidental and certainly NOT THROWN IN FRUSTRATION.The punch landed on Khan's leg not his balls. Khan could have easily continued but he quit instead. It is clear from your past posts you don't like Crawford for some unknown reason. All he does is win and dominate and he totally dominated Khan from round one until Khan quit to keep from being KOed.

Great post..

[STREET CLEANER]

Solid fighter with a great chin. Boxers with legs will always trouble him because of his style.

He lost close decisions to Thurman and Porter and did not get dominated. He needed to add a different trainer but still has not done it so that might have affected him at the top level.

I don't think that he is under-rated. He just get crapped on too much

[MDPopescu]

Garcia has no resume at 147.

[GhostofDempsey]

He went life and death with Matthysse, and the rest were either washed up, or it was Khan. He got gifts against Herrera and Peterson. He is a good fighter, with a great chin, decent power, good counter puncher. Flat-footed with horrible footwork, tends to get sloppy during exchanges. Lost both times he stepped up to the top tier welters.

I don't see him doing anything different going forward. He'll cash out of boxing on a couple more paydays against sure-wins or possibly one more loss against Spence or Crawford.