Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[IceTrayDaGang]

I didn’t insist anything. I literally agreed with this point. There is no way you missed it.

I also followed that with the jury in the Chauvin case didn’t make the wrong verdict. I asked you for some facts as to why you think that. You ducked that. Post some facts in support of that point.

Yes it’s a dumb way of thinking. You can’t just spew idiotic conspiracy theories with no facts.

I said in the King cop case the case was moved to an all white town that gave the defense an advantage. That was gerrymandering a jury.

The point I made, using both the king cops and OJ cases, was that gerrymandered juries like those juries do give bad verdicts as you stated.

The next point I made is Chauvin’s jury wasn’t gerrymandered like those juries. As such the jury verdict is more credible in his case.

So unless you can show where you have issues with the jury, it’s a dumb way of thinking. You and Madison are just grasping at anything with no facts to defend Chauvin because the victim is black. That is really what makes it dumb.

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding you had about my point.

This the post you are referring too? I dont see a yes or no from you.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Why are you lying? I clearly said which times it’s yes and which it’s no. In several posts.

I answered that. Juries are not all the same so it’s not a yes or no question.

I answered this already with cases pertinent to the discussIon- the ones you brought up and the Chauvin case.

You just keep wasting time because me saying the OJ verdict was wrong because doesn’t allow you to make the argument about me you want to.

Its time to move the discussion forward.

You didnt asnwer what I asked you. My question is that a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no? I am not asking you about GF's verdict.

you keep bringing up that in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call... I am not trying to dispute with you on this. I am asking you in general, a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no?

You keep saying the verdict made the right call in the GF's case.. But im not asking you about the GF's case.

Then for the 1992 case, you said the trial was moved to a town where there's no black people and the jury was mostly all whites... SO THEN A JURY'S VERDICT IS NOT ALWAYS THE RIGHT CALL CORRECT? Like in the 1992 case. RIGHT?

[The Big Dunn]

This the post you are referring too? I dont see a yes or no from you.

There are more posts than this. Stop the time wasting.

[The Big Dunn]

You didnt asnwer what I asked you. My question is that a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no? I am not asking you about GF's verdict.

you keep bringing up that in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call... I am not trying to dispute with you on this. I am asking you in general, a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no?

You keep saying the verdict made the right call in the GF's case.. But im not asking you about the GF's case.

Then for the 1992 case, you said the trial was moved to a town where there's no black people and the jury was mostly all whites... SO THEN A JURY'S VERDICT IS NOT ALWAYS THE RIGHT CALL CORRECT? Like in the 1992 case. RIGHT?

If you read what I wrote you know my answer
to the question.

Stop wasting time. Move forward.

[IceTrayDaGang]

There are more posts than this. Stop the time wasting.

why cant you bump those post then? you never seem to have this issue when trying to prove me wrong... now you are telling me to go look for it? I just want you to bump the post you said you answered my question. I dont know which post you are talking about.

[IceTrayDaGang]

If you read what I wrote you know my answer
to the question.

Stop wasting time. Move forward.

So you are admitting that you didnt answer my question directly??

My question is that in general (not talking about the GF's case), a jury's verdict is not always the right call, Yes or no?

Like in the 1992 case, the jury made the wrong call, RIGHT?

[The Big Dunn]

why cant you bump those post then? you never seem to have this issue when trying to prove me wrong... now you are telling me to go look for it? I just want you to bump the post you said you answered my question. I dont know which post you are talking about.

Because you’re being disingenuous

You said - I’m not reading all that- ok maybe you should of read it.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Because you’re being disingenuous

You said - I’m not reading all that- ok maybe you should of read it.

yeah, and in the past, you were always so quick to prove me wrong.. now you are saying "go look for it". ?

I am just asking you a question. in general, that a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no?

I am not asking you about the jury's verdict for GF's case so please dont answer in this manner "in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call"...

[IceTrayDaGang]

Because you’re being disingenuous

You said - I’m not reading all that- ok maybe you should of read it.

Yes, because I dont know which post you are referring too! Remember what you called me, a retard, so how do you expect me to read all the post from you? Make it easier on the retarded person by bumping the post you are referring too.

[The Big Dunn]

yeah, and in the past, you were always so quick to prove me wrong.. now you are saying "go look for it". ?

I am just asking you a question. in general, that a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no?

I am not asking you about the jury's verdict for GF's case so please dont answer in this manner "in the case of GF's the verdict made the right call"...

I answered that in general already.