Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post

    Yes, because I dont know which post you are referring too! Remember what you called me, a retard, so how do you expect me to read all the post from you? Make it easier on the retarded person by bumping the post you are referring too.
    I said you are either playing dumb or you are mildly ret@rded. I didn’t call you a ret@rd.

    I think you’re just playing dumb to waste time.

    We can easily move forward based on my answer. IMO, you don’t want to because once I said the OJ jury was wrong, you can’t make the race argument like Shoulder did.

    Just move forward.

    Comment


      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

      If you read what I wrote you know my answer
      to the question.

      Stop wasting time. Move forward.
      You made an example by bringing up a snake bite wont always kill you, yes or no. And i Answered it directly even tho it was a bad example, because snakes dont sit in groups and discuss and decide on if they should kill a person or not LOL.. so that was a very bad example but i still answered it directly!

      Comment


        Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

        I answered that in general already.
        bump it up one time for the retard here.

        Comment


          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

          I answered that in general already.
          Ok, i'll make it easier on you..

          YOU said in the case of GF's, the verdict made the right call..

          Then for the 1992 case, you said the trial took place in a town with no blacks and the jury was mostly all whites.. so they made the wrong call?

          So a jury's verdict is not always the right call then?

          Comment


            Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

            I said you are either playing dumb or you are mildly ret@rded. I didn’t call you a ret@rd.

            I think you’re just playing dumb to waste time.

            We can easily move forward based on my answer. IMO, you don’t want to because once I said the OJ jury was wrong, you can’t make the race argument like Shoulder did.

            Just move forward.
            the bolded.. you have also called me dumb. It's all good tho, im not catching feelings over this.

            Can you answer my question tho?

            Comment


              Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post

              You made an example by bringing up a snake bite wont always kill you, yes or no. And i Answered it directly even tho it was a bad example, because snakes dont sit in groups and discuss and decide on if they should kill a person or not LOL.. so that was a very bad example but i still answered it directly!
              The example was the type of question you asked.

              Yes, you did. You said, yes but clarified the yes. I did the exact same thing. I said no, then clarified which cases I thought they were right (Chauvin) and that they were wrong in the two cases you brought up ) King cops and OJ). I gave reasons why that is my opinion.

              WTF? Decide to kill a person? Yo you can’t actually think that was what I was getting at.

              Holy Sh-t. Yo dude this isn’t funny. You really have a difficulty comprehending what is written.
              Last edited by The Big Dunn; 05-08-2025, 11:39 AM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

                Can’t answer that other than the way I already have on multiple occasions. You are refusing to move forward.

                In the case of Chauvin, no. The jury verdict was the right call

                You can’t make it a yes or no question that implies all juries are the same when they’re not.

                Its like asking - does a snake bite kill you yes or no? It depends on the snake. Depends on the toxins in their poison. Can’t be limited to yes or no.
                Which is why a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right??? because not all juries are the same.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post

                  the bolded.. you have also called me dumb. It's all good tho, im not catching feelings over this.

                  Can you answer my question tho?
                  It’s clear from your last post that you just struggle with comprehending English because it isn’t your 1st language.

                  I should’ve taken that into consideration.

                  Comment


                    The Big Dunn

                    Can't quote you last post again --

                    No you didnt, you said "in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call"... I am not asking you about the verdict for GF.

                    So you agreed that the verdict for the 1992 Rodney King's case is right then?​

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post

                      Which is why a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right??? because not all juries are the same.
                      I said this yesterday dude. Please just stop and move forward if you’re capable of doing so.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP