Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[The Big Dunn]

So bump it! Why are you making it so hard? If you said this yesterday, show me and we can end this here. A jury's verdict is not always right. Agree or disagree? Since it seems like yes or no is scaring you off from answering this lol.

We’ve been over that. No.

Im not making it hard in any way. We could’ve moved forward yesterday. You made this hard by refusing to read the response yet trying to continue the discussion.

You have my answer to that question multiple times.

[IceTrayDaGang]

We’ve been over that. No.

Im not making it hard in any way. We could’ve moved forward yesterday.

You have my answer to that question multiple times.

So you agreed with me that a jury's verdict is not always right. That's all. see was that so hard?

[The Big Dunn]

So you agreed with me that a jury's verdict is not always right. That's all. see was that so hard?

I did yesterday. Now what is your point in clarifying this?

[IceTrayDaGang]

The Big Dunn

"I did yesterday. Now what is your point in clarifying this"

No you ddnt, you kept saying "in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call"... "the case for the 1992 was moved to a town where there's no black people and the jury was mostly white people" and that you dont agree with the verdict... I didnt asked you about your opinion on the verdict, the question was "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no".. you kept dancing around from giving a straight Yes or no answer.

[The Big Dunn]

The Big Dunn

"I did yesterday. Now what is your point in clarifying this"

No you ddnt, you kept saying "in the case of GF, the verdict made the right call"... "the case for the 1992 was moved to a town where there's no black people and the jury was mostly white people" and that you dont agree with the verdict... I didnt asked you about your opinion on the verdict, the question was "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, yes or no".. you kept dancing around from giving a straight Yes or no answer.

Don’t forget all the other things written that clearly answered this yesterday. You seem to be leaving that out.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Don’t forget all the other things written that clearly answered this yesterday. You seem to be leaving that out.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

I never asked for you any of the extra's, That's my point here! you sugarcoated your response by adding in what i didnt asked.. When all you have to say is "yes, a jury's verdict is not always the right call".

I asked you a straight question, "a jury's verdict is not always the right call".. Do you agree or not. And you never gave a straight answer.

[The Big Dunn]

I never asked for you any of the extra's, That's my point here! you sugarcoated your response by adding in what i didnt asked.. When all you have to say is "yes, a jury's verdict is not always the right call".

I asked you a straight question, "a jury's verdict is not always the call right".. Do you agree or not. And you never gave a straight answer

I clarified the response. I gave examples where I agreed they’re wrong and an example I thought they were right.

You did similar with the snake bite question analogy.

I gave the same straight answer you did in the snake bite analogy.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

[IceTrayDaGang]

I clarified the response. I gave examples where I agreed they’re wrong and an example I thought they were right.

You did similar with the snake bite question analogy.

I gave the same straight answer you did in the snake bite analogy.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

I didnt asked you to clarify anything or gave examples!!!! do you understand?

The question was "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, RIGHT? and you never answered it directly...

[IceTrayDaGang]

I clarified the response. I gave examples where I agreed they’re wrong and an example I thought they were right.

You did similar with the snake bite question analogy.

I gave the same straight answer you did in the snake bite analogy.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

you asked a snake question when it's not close to the same question here and my first response was "YES".. I never saw this from you from the question being asked from me.

[Madison Boxing]

I clarified the response. I gave examples where I agreed they’re wrong and an example I thought they were right.

You did similar with the snake bite question analogy.

I gave the same straight answer you did in the snake bite analogy.

Now what is your point in clarifying this?

the only snake in this thread is you