Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[The Big Dunn]

I didnt asked you to clarify anything or gave examples!!!! do you understand?

The question was "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, RIGHT? and you never answered it directly...

I didn’t ask you either in the snake bite analogy question. But you did and it made sense because the question wasn’t an absolute one.

I literally said I agree in some cases. Then I gave examples why.m

Now what is your point in clarifying this about juries? You seem incapable of moving the discussion forward.

[IceTrayDaGang]

I didn’t ask you either in the snake bite analogy question. But you did and it made sense because the question wasn’t an absolute one.

I literally said I agree in some cases. Then I gave examples why.m

Now what is your point in clarifying this about juries? You seem incapable of moving the discussion forward.

You asked not all snake bites will kill you right... and I said yes, because it depends if the snake is poisonous and how strong the venom is.

Snakes dont sit in groups and decide if they should kill a person or not...

[The Big Dunn]

you asked a snake question when it's not close to the same question here and my first response was "YES".. I never saw this from you from the question being asked from me.

I asked an analogous question.

You didn’t see it because you didn’t read the response.

[The Big Dunn]

You asked not all snake bites will kill you right... and I said yes, because it depends if the snake is poisonous and how strong the venom is.

Ok we’ve been through this enough.

Now what is your point about clarifying this about juries?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Can’t answer that other than the way I already have on multiple occasions. You are refusing to move forward.

In the case of Chauvin, no. The jury verdict was the right call

You can’t make it a yes or no question that implies all juries are the same when they’re not.

Its like asking - does a snake bite kill you yes or no? It depends on the snake. Depends on the toxins in their poison. Can’t be limited to yes or no.

The bolded...

and i agreed, and say YES, it depends if the snake is poisonous and how strong the venom is... SO i was agreeing with what you said, the bolded.

YOU on the other hand, did not answer my question directly "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right? ... instead you said "in the case of GF, the verdict was right".. Do you see the flaw in your response?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Ok we’ve been through this enough.

Now what is your point about clarifying this about juries?

See post up top.

[The Big Dunn]

The bolded...

and i agreed, and say YES, it depends if the snake is poisonous and how strong the venom is... SO i was agreeing with what you said, the bolded.

YOU on the other hand, did not answer my question directly "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right? ... instead you said "in the case of GF, the verdict was right".. Do you see the flaw in your response?

Ok we’ve been through this enough.

Now what is your point about clarifying this about juries?

[IceTrayDaGang]

The Big Dunn

Do you see where you asked me "does a snake bite kill you yes or no? It depends on the snake. Depends on the toxins in their poison.

And I said YES, agreeing with what you said about depends on the snake if it's poisonous and how strong the venom is.

YOU never gave me the same response when I asked you, "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right?

[The Big Dunn]

See post up top.

The post up top is post #482. It is clear that had you read the response you said you didn’t, you would’ve seen I said I agree with you in some cases.

Now we should be past this.

Is there a follow up point you are going to make?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Ok we’ve been through this enough.

Now what is your point about clarifying this about juries?

clarify what juries??? I never asked you about this.

I asked you, a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right?

You response should be "right".. But i never saw this from you.