Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[The Big Dunn]

So he did say that is a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances, then?

No. I gave you all he said. If you wish to be disingenuous by parsing it out of the whole quote, go right ahead.

I can’t stop you. Don’t worry Madison will cosign you.

[Hector Enrique]

so floydy had a lethal amount of drugs in his system but also if you think that influenced floydys behaviour then you are a racist, have i got that right?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Don’t play dumb. The no is about bumping it.

I explained why multiple times- because you chose not to read it.

You already know my response to that from all of our back and forth.

Now that this is cleared up, do you have a point to make related to juries not being right all the time?

so that post is what you wanted me to go read??? chose to read what??? and what did you explained???????

the question being asked was "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right?

Your response should be "right".. IF YOU agreed with me... what's there to explain? what did i asked you to explain?

[The Big Dunn]

so floydy had a lethal amount of drugs in his system but also if you think that influenced floydys behaviour then you are a racist, have i got that right?

No. You’re a racist regardless of this discussion.

Floyd didn’t have a lethal amount of drugs in his system. The medical examiner’s full quote from the article Shoulder roll posted shows this.

If you lie and over exaggerate the amount of drugs in his system to defend Chauvin, it is very likely you are doing so because you are a racist that doesn’t mind that a white cop killed a black man with a criminal record.

This clear it up for you Madison?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Don’t be dishonest and disingenuous by leaving out that I also included the all black OJ jury and said their verdict was wrong as well.

Don't be dishonest and disingenuous by leaving out I mentioned the 2 juries in the King Cops and OJ cases didn’t seem to meet the standard of the 6th amendmt.

You pull out a piece of the post instead of the whole
post. That is the garbage Shoulder, you, Madison, Dr. z and those like you try to pull. I don’t get it.

The whole post lays out my opinion very directly.

I am trying to get to your next point. Do you have one?

Leaving what out???? that you said the jury was mostly white people???

Once again, i asked you "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right?

IF YOU agreed, then your response should have been "right"...

like when you asked me about the snake question, and I agreed and said "yes"...

what are you even talking about being dishonest, leaving out what out? OJ jury was all black??

[The Big Dunn]

Leaving what out???? that you said the jury was mostly white people???

Once again, i asked you "a jury's verdict is not always the right call, right?

IF YOU agreed, then your response should have been "right"...

like when you asked me about the snake question, and I agreed and said "yes"...

what are you even talking about being dishonest, leaving out what out? OJ jury was all black??

I am trying to get to your next point. Do you have one?

[ShoulderRoll]

No. I gave you all he said. If you wish to be disingenuous by parsing it out of the whole quote, go right ahead.

I can’t stop you. Don’t worry Madison will cosign you.

What do you mean no?

That was literally what he said.

The fact that you can’t answer simple yes or no questions and try to weasel out of them is not a good look.

[The Big Dunn]

What do you mean no?

That was literally what he said.

The fact that you can’t answer simple yes or no questions and try to weasel out of them is not a good look.

Huh. Not only did I answer your question directly with No, I then put his whole quote in the response showing you that he said more than that to justify my answer of No.

What do I mean by no? I mean you are dishonestly trying to make that piece of what he said all that he said.

You are parsing out the whole quote because it clearly shows he is clarifying that piece.

Have I directly answered your question?

[Hector Enrique]

Huh. Not only did I answer your question directly with No, I then put his whole quote in the response showing you that he said more than that to justify my answer of No.

What do I mean by no? I mean you are dishonestly trying to make that piece of what he said all that he said.

You are parsing out the whole quote because it clearly shows he is clarifying that piece.

Have I directly answered your question?

it was pretty clear what the quote said, quit gaslighting

[The Big Dunn]

it was pretty clear what the quote said, quit gaslighting

Yes it was. That is why he added, "I am not saying this killed him."

No one is gaslighting anyone. You guys are choosing to be dishonest. I can’t stop you. But I can post his whole quote so others know what you’re doing.