Are the detractors suggesting Canelo take a pay cut???

[TonyGe]

you talk utter rubbish

they offered Saunders $1.5mil... said, take-it-or-leave-it... and then quickly ran off to sign yet another no-hoper

NEWS FLASH: that is not how to make a fight you muppet

oh, then they ran off to the media and pulled their usual lame schtick...

**** in Loefflers voice ****

" *chuckle* well... we cant force these guys to fight Gennady "

oh, nearly forgot... then they leaked that their offer was $4m

which Saunders immediately said was a downright lie, the offer was $1.5m... the exact same lowball offer they threw at Danny Jacobs

Tony Baloney... stop pulling that lame casual-fan bullshlt

stop twisting out-of-negotiation comments and pretending they mean something, you dumb kid

there were 3 REAL opportunities for that fight to happen

1) they threw Saunders a $1.5m lowball, and then quickly ran off to sign yet another no-hoper

2) BJS signed to fight Golovkin in Kazakhstan, but Golovkin understandably selected Canelo... so stop that ducking bullshlt you childish moron, if anyone avoided it was Golovkin

3) BJS said " I will fight you in June "... but Golovkin selected Vanes

if Golovkin had fought Saunders instead of Vanes, for UNDISPUTED... he would not have been stripped by the IBF, because a unification > a mando

stop talking bollocks you excuse-making muppet

FACT: the guys who found $4.5m+ to share with Kell Brook... but could only find $1.5m to share with Billy-Joe Saunders... were in no hurry whatsoever to fight BJS

and do not pull that " Brook is a star " rubbish... Brook was not - AND STILL IS NOT - a star... that rubbish was started by idiot Golovkin fans, he is no more well-known than Saunders

and btw, Saunders did not ask for more money, he wanted that fight in the UK if they were only willing to pay him $1.5m

FACT: they were willing to fight Brook in the UK, but they were not willing to fight Saunders in the UK... and they were not willing to pay him a THIRD of what they paid Kell Brook... which tells the whole story right there

and NO... switching Eubanks purse to Kell Brook was not necessary, nor does it have anything to do with the fact that they were not willing to split the pot fairly with Saunders.. the money was either there from the Brook fight, or it was not... don't try to pretend that they voluntarily took a loss on Brook by paying him 3x more than they had to

Canelo gave Golovkin 45% because he REALLY wanted that fight... Golovkin offered Saunders $1.5m because he did not want that fight, as his selection of Vanes proved

btw, don't argue, I have links for everything...
24.com/2016/03/saunders-offered-1-5m-golovkin-fight-not-4m/






they caved in, because Canelo was desperate for that fight

Canelo was desperate... because of the result in the first fight, and because of the positive drug test

nothing in that situation is similar to Smith and Saunders

and Canelo is a even bigger star now than he was before moving up to 160

I agree that Canelo should - and probably will - offer them more

chill man... you have no idea what is going to happen, who Canelo will select

sit back quietly and wait happily for the Golovkin/Sacramento fight... rather than criticize a guy who will obviously select a much better opponent

Like I said. A direct quote from Sanders indicated that he was offered life changing money and that wasn't enough to get him in the ring with Golovkin.

[stealthradon]

tut tut... Canelo increased that offer to a shockingly undeserved 45%

Hypekin avoided the guy who was holding his " dream " to select Vanes

So GGG should get less than half, yet the fighters he fights, should get half? Only in Caneloland.

[Citizen Koba]

hey moron... they could have fought Saunders under the exact same terms they fought Brook

it is absurd to suggest that the money they could afford to offer for a middleweight unification to become undisputed... was only a THIRD what they could offer an unknown welterweight

you excuse-making muppet LMAO

and what about refusing to fight Saunders in June, to become UNDISPUTED... preferring instead to select Vanes... what is your excuse for that?

the fact is, they were clearly in no hurry to make that fight... they bent over backward to justify fighting scrubs, and would not lift a finger to fight a world class treat... just like when they totally refused to negotiate on weight with little 153lb Cotto, but were happy to fight Rosado at 158

like I said... you churn out the excuses, just like the other muppets

#tarredandfeathered

Moron, huh? So you're thinking that HBO paid the fighters purses for a SKY PPV fought in the UK huh Scrappy? Well, that is an easy mistake to make I guess...

Like I say, man, your obsession makes you ******... or maybe you already were ******. I neither know nor care.

[aboutfkntime]

Like I said. A direct quote from Sanders indicated that he was offered life changing money and that wasn't enough to get him in the ring with Golovkin.

FACT: he signed to fight Hypekin in Kazakhstan... you excuse-making ***wit

[aboutfkntime]

Moron, huh? So you're thinking that HBO paid the fighters purses for a SKY PPV fought in the UK huh Scrappy? Well, that is an easy mistake to make I guess...

Like I say, man, your obsession makes you ******... or maybe you already were ******. I neither know nor care.

nobody said that, you excuse-making shlthead

FACT: they could have fought Saunders under the exact same terms they fought Brook

FACT: it is absurd to suggest that the most money they could offer for a middleweight unification to become undisputed... was only a THIRD what they could offer an unknown welterweight

#excusemaking***wits
#casualfansforlife

[aboutfkntime]

NOTE: ALL of these excuse-making fanboys happily attended the "Golovkin made fools of his fans" thread

[TonyGe]

FACT: he signed to fight Hypekin in Kazakhstan... you excuse-making ***wit

All I can say is what Saunders has said. He got offered life changing money and thought it was too risky.

[Citizen Koba]

nobody said that, you excuse-making shlthead

FACT: they could have fought Saunders under the exact same terms they fought Brook

FACT: it is absurd to suggest that the most money they could offer for a middleweight unification to become undisputed... was only a THIRD what they could offer an unknown welterweight

#excusemaking***wits
#casualfansforlife

You're getting dumber by the second Scrappy Doo and all the lame insults in the world won't do anything to change that... You just acknowledged that SKY / Hearn offered that deal to Brook not HBO so in what world does it follow that HBO would have SKY level £££s to pay Saunders the same amount as Brook when it wasn't even HBO that paid Brook?

Are you suggestiing that Golovkin, an HBO fighter, should have somehow offered to put Saunders - a Warren fighter at that time - on a SKY ppv? You'll have to explain how that would work man, cos I guess I'm not quite getting it.

[aboutfkntime]

You're getting dumber by the second Scrappy Doo and all the lame insults in the world won't do anything to change that... You just acknowledged that SKY / Hearn offered that deal to Brook not HBO so in what world does it follow that HBO would have SKY level £££s to pay Saunders the same amount as Brook when it wasn't even HBO that paid Brook?

Are you suggestiing that Golovkin, an HBO fighter, should have somehow offered to put Saunders - a Warren fighter at that time - on a SKY ppv? You'll have to explain how that would work man, cos I guess I'm not quite getting it.

I am suggesting that you are a ridiculous excuse-making buttlick

FACT: they could have fought Saunders anywhere/anyway they wanted, and easily offered him more than a THIRD what they paid Kell Brook... you fanboy spastic

grow up, and find some pride... you have blurted out silly excuses to justify every single one of Hypekins ducks LMAO... oh, as you frantically attempt to distance yourself from the other ignorant fanboys who got exposed over the last year-or-so

grow up, you are embarrassing yourself

what excuse would you like to blurt out for Hypekin selecting Vanes, when Saunders was sitting there with Golovkin's WBO "dream" offering to fight him in June?

you have blurted out silly excuses to justify all of Golovkin's other ducks, what silly excuse would you like to blurt out for that doozy?

[Citizen Koba]

I am suggesting that you are a ridiculous excuse-making buttlick

FACT: they could have fought Saunders anywhere/anyway they wanted, and easily offered him more than a THIRD what they paid Kell Brook... you fanboy spastic

grow up, and find some pride... you have blurted out silly excuses to justify every single one of Hypekins ducks LMAO... oh, as you frantically attempt to distance yourself from the other ignorant fanboys who got exposed over the last year-or-so

grow up, you are embarrassing yourself

what excuse would you like to blurt out for Hypekin selecting Vanes, when Saunders was sitting there with Golovkin's WBO "dream" offering to fight him in June?

you have blurted out silly excuses to justify all of Golovkin's other ducks, what silly excuse would you like to blurt out for that doozy?

But they didn't pay Kell Brook, did they you turnip, SKY did. That's the whole point. There's no dodging this one Scrappy, you just made a d1ck of yourself again.

Bye now, Scrappy... I ain't gonna waste my words repeating stuff just for your sorry ass. If you really want to know my opinions they ain't changed much. You can go rooting through my trash...