Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd
Collapse
-
GhostofDempsey likes this.
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Richard Richardson View Post
Depends how you define sudden, you are saying he developed it between the age of 45 and 46 because when he was 45 there is a video of him sitting in the back of a police car
Your bs is irrelevant. Doesn’t matter if he was claustrophobic or not. What happened outside of the car is what matters.
Keep squirming.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
I didn’t say that either
Your bs is irrelevant. Doesn’t matter if he was claustrophobic or not. What happened outside of the car is what matters.
Keep squirming.Mr Mitts
GhostofDempsey like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
You don’t even make any sense. Keep squirming.
He did ONE autopsy. It says what the cause of death was. And he never changed anything. He even told you he never changed anything.
you can’t read now, huh?
Did the cause of death change from the autopsy to the public report? Yes or no? Let me know dumbass
You’re a victimhood mentality moron.Mr Mitts
GhostofDempsey like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Richardson View Post
When and why did he suddenly become claustrophobic and develop a fear of sitting in a police car then? Because u said its not down to the drugs, and now you are saying he didn't develop claustrophobia in the year prior to the event so what happened?
How can I know when he developed Claustrophobia? Could have been years before his death.
But that’s irrelevant. What happened outside the car is what’s important. He wasn’t on trial. Chauvin was.
The experts proved you wrong. Stop squirming with irrelevant bs. Your desperation doesn’t concern me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
There was one autopsy. But the medical examiner released preliminary findings and then a final autopsy report several days later. Chauvin was initially charged with 3rd degree murder and then (after days of riots and political pressure) with the more serious 2nd degree murder. As we’ve been discussing for several pages now.
You’re a victimhood mentality moron.
Run away. You know what’s up
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
Why did you avoid the question. Did the cause of death change from when he mentioned it 12 hours after his death?
Run away. You know what’s up
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
He didn’t give a cause of death in the preliminary findings. Just said that there was no evidence of asphyxiation or strangulation.
An autopsy with no cause of death? What is the purpose of an autopsy then, genius? Please tell us
how embarrassing. Is this the definition of an autopsy? Yes or no?
“a postmortem examination to discover the cause of death or the extent of disease.”
I'm really happy that you are on record saying the autopsy doesn’t mention a cause of death. Really says a lot about how much you are willing to embarrass yourself when you are proven wrong
Last edited by travestyny; 05-09-2025, 07:12 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
He didn’t? I see it right there on the autopsy. I guess you are blind now
An autopsy with no cause of death? What is the purpose of an autopsy then, genius? Please tell us
how embarrassing. Is this the definition of an autopsy? Yes or no?
“a postmortem examination to discover the cause of death or the extent of disease.”
I'm really happy that you are on record saying the autopsy doesn’t mention a cause of death. Really says a lot about how much you are willing to embarrass yourself when you are proven wrong
See how the words are different?
Comment
-
Comment